Slobodan Mišković
Slobodan Mišković
So, in this first iteration, we learn that `SuppressEmpty => undef` behaviour is the only difference that test suite can uncover for `10_responses.t`. But, while doing this in perl code...
@pplu, with this change, test suite passes on my machine (minus some failure on 01_load.t, but same happens on the base branch, and I hope is unrelated). Let me know...
@pplu , this PR just merges into your `xml2hash` branch, so probably safe to accept and continue work in there?
Or, should we maybe change the target to be the next release branch to see how it behaves?
#282 seems related to this as well
Ah, no, i'll try to give it a go in the upcoming week. Do you have release timeframe for it? Thanks
We did some internal tests, and `XML::Hash::XS` seemed to work for all requests we are making (various S3 and SQS), and it brought ***massive*** speed improvements to some bulk SQS...
For sure there could be a more elegant way to handle responses in the long term that can both be efficient and ensure correctness. Thanks for thinking about it and...
Awesome, I've created #366 to explore this.
We are getting hit by the same problem with time to register initial fields scaling non-linearly for each added field. So a form with 500 fields may load in a...