Isaac Clayton

You're right, this statement is incorrect. `InitialProposal.md` Is the initial proposal, with minor edits, as it was originally published. Fuchsia not banning Rust was first addressed [here](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/a-stable-modular-abi-for-rust/12347/45), and then later...

By the way, here's Fuchsia's current [Programming Language Policy](https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/fuchsia/+/refs/heads/master/docs/contribute/governance/policy/programming_languages.md). From the policy: > - Rust is approved for use throughout the Fuchsia Platform Source Tree, with the following exceptions: >...

I remember reading through this conversational thread and thought it was a great idea. One thing to think about, in the case of dynamic linking, is how each ABI will...

> Ideally the default ABI for Rust would be something that don't have any restrictions on the types you are using (like Result), nor having runtime penalties (like a translation...

> I took a look at the rustbook you started to write. Where do you think that this chapter would fit? In [ABI Selection](https://slightknack.github.io/rust-abi-wiki/discussion/selection.html)? Yes, that'd be the right spot....

> For minimum viable product, I think neither needs to hold. Without complex generics, and with a bunch of shims and adapters to glue things together, it is still useful....

Any updates on this?