Samuel Levis
...to explain why I asked the above question: As with #1586 , I manually incorporated the code changes from #1587 in mksurfdata_esmf.
> I've reviewed this. The only difference I see is that I believe this line in the ctsm5.2 mksurfdata branch: > > ``` > write (6,*) subname, 'Error: sum of...
Thanks @ekluzek In the next few weeks and months we will post updates to the process of generating CTSM surface datasets here: https://github.com/ESCOMP/ctsm/issues/644
> We should evaluate this for the new mksurfdata_esmf and modify fsurdat tools . A few thoughts that I wanted to put in writing here: Paleo applications tend to vary...
@olyson #1853 is now merged (in the ctsm5.2.mksurfdata branch). Feel free to close this issue if appropriate.
I have now confirmed that the new mksurdata_esmf has NOT been pointing to the new glacier dataset. I will make the change.
Does switching to the new glacier dataset eliminate the need for **both** old datasets, the standard and the mergeGreenland?
> I think we want to evaluate the checkFlag with some of Adam's datasets that we saw problems with. I think to do that we'll need to update the ctsm5.2...
> 1. when `gen_mksurfdata_build.sh` fails, I had to manually remove `tool_bld` before running again. Is there a --clean option to cleanup the failed build? Currently no. We rely on the...
> I then tried our supported ARCTIC var-res grid, and it went on for a bit, but then also triggered the checkflag error (Maximum overlap area=2.46564e-08 occurs between elem id=125576276...