Stefan de Konink
Stefan de Konink
I think the Dummy is the Abstract here.
If a fake dataSourceRef was added, just empty them. Problem solved.
I don't agree. We did not change the schema, we add more validation rules. That this shows that the producer was producing non-standard implementations is on them.
Many producers make wrong EPIP, it does not validate. Is it bad / it good. It is bad and does not support adoption. For now I guess your producers have...
1. Nothing broke. Publications (finally) got validated. 2. Master is master and receives fixes. 3. It is obvious that when _next_ is merged is _master_ things _will_ break.
When the strong typing is explicitly removed (field_type_names_fmt), the basic concept seems to be working (no issues with resolving types that have not been defined yet). But I see that...
@tefra can you give me a pointer where I can find a plugin example?
And yet another alternative #271 ;-)
@gtjoseph I agree, just sacrifices two bytes ;-)