skelsec
skelsec
This seems to be an issue with the `cryptography` module which is a 3rd party package, not written by me.
Sure, I'm interested! Will have more time to look into this starting the new year
is this one still needed? What do you think of a solution that instead of introducing a new input variable we could allow the users to send a custom object...
Merged your PR and released a new version. Thank you for your contribution!
local directory crawl is not currently planned, but should be easy to implement (I have no time for that currently tho)
I mean that's cool but it was commented out for a reason XD Reason being that not all system autdit objects are currently implemented so it will throw an exception...
Hello, thank you for the PR! May I ask what `bad bytes` are you referring to? This PR will be rejected, because the `nTSecurityDescriptor` must be returning `bytes` or `bytearray`...