Steve Riesenberg
Steve Riesenberg
Thanks @CrazyParanoid. I am not necessarily in favor of introducing a class like this for the sake of convenience only, when it's not clear whether it will be useful to...
See also gh-16909 for removal of deprecated implementations.
Will do @spencergibb. I'll work on this in the coming week. ---- It probably goes without saying, but I'm very excited about this feature and have used it in demos...
@EeeasyCode see https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-gateway/pull/3591, let me know if you have any feedback.
@jzheaux you may consider adding https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security/issues/16909 to this issue as well.
@jonah1und1 thanks for checking. We are working on a few high priority items for the release and then I will be reviewing your PR. If you would like to get...
@jacknie84 the PR Build failed due to code formatting issues related to imports. Let me know if you need any assistance.
Thanks @jacknie84! This has been merged into `6.2.x` as 4c6fef82b9b8d2a985305bcd1c0d59cc60245583 along with polish commit 86f3cd6dc7c7c7bc0e44e934d8d0c9405ead1b89.
Hi @erizzo, thanks for reaching out! I'm sorry you had issues and had to spend time figuring this out. > The workaround is to specify a request matcher for the...
@jonah1und1 thanks for your patiance. As discussed in [this comment](https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security/pull/16039#issuecomment-2783889662), I have decided to move forward as-is with this improvement. This PR is merged into `main` as 9674532f4dbf63fa1257ab11d62f2de01dee12b3 with polish...