rspec_junit_formatter
rspec_junit_formatter copied to clipboard
Show detail for failing examples using aggregate_failures
Fixes #56
Example
Before
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58929/58929c48fc6cf54b479f3996734678381d8313b0" alt=""
After
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92f49/92f4993e1cb1e8bd8b81fc360890eefd785c856b" alt=""
Note
There is a minor change to how backtraces are formatted. It’s now the same as what rspec
shows when ran from directly:
Before
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/849b2/849b2d435418c191c062e0cb2033980508a2ffd5" alt=""
After
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d748/5d7487e11467672073214ba68ea8a8ba23df2ad4" alt=""
I am waiting for review and merge from owner
Sorry that this hasn't had attention in a while, @jasoncodes.
I really like this idea, but I'm very concerned that the parsing code seems to be a bit brittle and may break if future rspecs change output formats slightly. I'm not sure what the best answer here, which is why I haven't really jumped into it. 🤔
What if I made the guards less strict so instead of raising on an unexpected format, they instead silently continue? This should at worst output a bit of duplication instead of erroring.
I’m not sure how to best add coverage for that though. Conditionally stub out fully_formatted_lines
so it does something different than expected? Not sure if it’d be worth the effort.
@sj26 Sorry to bother, but do you have any further opinion on this?
@sj26 Any chance of an update?
Right now we're running on a fork based on this PR. I too would appreciate any opinions on a way forward. Thanks!
Any updates on this guys, would really love to see it going in ?
This would be a great addition to merge and then cut a release...
@sj26 any chance we can get this one on a new release? :)