sisyphus
sisyphus
> This discussion looks to also be relevant to https://github.com/StrawberryPerl/Perl-Dist-Strawberry/issues/18 Are you suggesting that modifying perlexe.manifest as @ikegami suggested (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/design/globalizing/use-utf8-code-page) might fix @LordAro's issue ? I take it that it...
> I was more thinking the UTF-8 issues raised here would also impact that request, Heh ... I see. I think you're right. Having altered the ACP to 65001, the...
> also couldn't work out what the "proper" full name of en_GB.UTF-8 was When, on a UCRT build of perl-5.39.4 I run the script that @tonycoz provided, I see the...
> Did anybody solve this? If you're asking whether there's a known solution that will fix this problem on current Strawberry Perl builds, then AFAIK the answer is "no". If...
`> UCRT aside, this is something that needs to be handled in Perl itself. See https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/21562` Yes, thanks for pointing that out. That issue has been labelled as a "Release...
> Strawberry Perl does not add or remove any flags for module compilations. The flag change I originally had in mind was to perl itself - and I know that...
Yes - though if you do nothing about it, perl will still build fine and all tests will pass - as perl's test suite does not test the bessel functions....
In https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/22211#issuecomment-2113807463, I've suggested that tests be added and I've provided a draft test script. It's a little bit murky in that, on both Ubuntu and Windows, the implementations of...
Yes - I've opted for 11 decimal digits of precision which , I think, will be sufficiently lenient as to not cause any test failures. But we won't really know...
@shawnlaffan , I assume (and hope) that SP-5.40.0.1-RC1 was built without the POSIX.xs patch applied. It's producing rubbish for the POSIX::j0() function: ``` > perl -MPOSIX -le "for(10.5, 11.5, 12.5)...