sirisian

Include examples for every possible decorator. From the decorator proposal: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decorators Do I need ```kind``` at all if each decorator context has a type that is a global object? ClassDecorator...

Would the [uint8] syntax conflict with https://github.com/sirisian/ecmascript-types#multidimensional-and-jagged-array-support-via-user-defined-index-operators In that part of the spec I don't mention typing the index value of an any array. ```js let foo:[int32] = [1, 2,...

Examples to think about. Basic typed object return: ```js function F():{ (a:uint8), (b:float32) } { return { a: 1, b: 2 }; } const { a, b } = F();...

I have to say that I dislike the ```[:int32]``` syntax. There has to be a better way to do things. Ideally I'd want to write: ```js function F():[int32, int64] {...

Added changes to the proposal: https://github.com/sirisian/ecmascript-types#typed-return-values-for-destructuring Also changed the array length type syntax to use [:uint32] syntax. Now I need syntax for optional object properties. Also I'm really considering adding...

> Is it the source or the rendered result that you're saying would look clean? The source, to make it less redundant. (But the outputted HTML would probably also change,...

You get some weirdness also when the grammar rule itself is using ins. (Which comes up when adding new rules). ```xml (...) Foo : `.` ``` It'll work and render...

@tjcrowder You might want to look at: https://github.com/rbuckton/grammarkdown since that handles the grammar parsing. Looks like with https://github.com/rbuckton/grammarkdown/issues/26 they fixed at lest one issue with ins and del. I opened...

Thanks for all the ideas. > More images should work out of the box. > Larger images than, say 2k x 2k, are trickier to support > You can work...

That clears things up a lot for me, and it will probably work for my use case. Just so I'm correct in your last equation I'd use >= 0.5 and...