Name differences

[henit]

It might be logical reasons that I don't know about, but I wonder about some of the name differences between sinon-methods:

spy.notCalledWith assert.neverCalledWith

Should they have the same name?

stub.callsFake stub.callsArg stub.callsArgWith stub.callThrough stub.callArg stub.callArgWith

I often end up checking the docs where there is 'calls*' and where there is 'call*'.

[mroderick]

Thank you for pointing it out!

I agree, there should be more consistency in naming.

I think an approach like this could work:

• create a README or wiki page, describing the naming conventions
• rename all methods that do not follow the naming conventions
• add deprecation warnings to all deprecated method names
• publish new version
• in a later MAJOR version, remove the deprecated methods

Do you want to take a stab at it?

[henit]

That sounds like a good approach.

I think Sinon is a very good library, and would very much like to contribute to it if possible. Unfortunately, there is no room for this at the moment, hopefully it will change soon.

[mantoni]

Related discussion in #1000.