Spam comments stay on the project for pretty long
Currently, there are a lot of non-sense and spam comments in the PRs and Issues. For example:
- Incubate issue is full of them.
- The oldest one is over half a year old.
- Table of content issue has them as well
- Web assmebly PR also has a bunch of spam comments.
- This very post collects them as well, ironically (At least I cannot imagine how
Hhhhhyyis advancing the discussion)
Questions to anyone interested in the matter:
- Is this just a temporary thing, because maintainers are currently pretty busy with their private lives?
- Are there any other solutions to get rid of them (the spammers, not the maintainers)?
- Personally, I think it's annoying, unprofessional and worth a little effort to get rid of. What do others think?
Ideas: AFAICT, @sindresorhus is lifting the whole weight alone at the moment. Reading Github's guide on disruptive comments it says that write access or an organization is needed to moderate comments. Maybe there is some person, @sindresorhus trusts enough and who has some time on their hands.
Alternatively, we could try to get obvious Spam reported. I tried with GitHub, but didn't seem to work. Maybe it works if more people report the same comment. Or, maybe it's an option to notify maintainers somehow.
Just some ideas, curious for feedback.
Hhhhyy
You should google it, my bro š
Maybe there should be a keyword to use, to indicate that an issue is Spam.
I want to help you.
I can help out
Scams are prohibited
Hi! Iām interested in contributing to this project and would like to help with this issue. Could you please provide some guidance on how best to proceed or assign it to me? Iām excited to contribute and learn.
Thank you!
Hi @Angel-Mathew007 Why this project specifically? The maintainer is fairly busy & I have no idea how you can help. Feel free to come up with your own ideas.
Maybe Scams
Testing
One small thing that might help with reducing spam is adding structured issue/PR templates. When contributors have to fill in specific fields (like description, steps)it makes random comments less likely.
@prriyayadav Good idea! Are there templates for comments as well? From my observation, Spam issues are quickly closed, but comments (see the ones above) stay forever
Hi my account are way messed up some one is using. Y accounts I need advice
Listing the complete problem would have been better.
Those AI-generated 'reviews' need to be considered spam as well.
The guidelines already say that an Awesome List should be 'non-generated'. So I feel like comments should come under the same scrutiny.
Reviewing two lists is a requirement, and those AI-generated ones are not really reviews. They often point out issues that do not exist, and just repeat the guidelines.
I do not think mandating a template would help, as they take away creativity, the same way AI does.
Enforcing a minimum word limit might work, maybe. AFAIK GitHub does not natively support that.
I will not pinpoint specifics, but there are a few on my PR #3688. Hint: see comments of users whose names start with 'T'. There is one on this issue as well.