Different conflicting interpretations of CUDS containers in processes

[pablo-de-andres]

In GitLab by @urbanmatthias on Mar 16, 2020, 11:55

1. input and output are in the container of the process --> everything is in the container of the process.
2. the succeeding cuds are in the container of the preceding cuds --> everything is in the container of the input.

The first option is more natural from a holistic perspective, the seconds one is more natural from a chronological one. Plus the second one is more natural to scientists, at least for the cases that occurred so far.

Intermediate solution:

• Go for the second one for now.

In the long run we should consider maybe having to interpretations of the container principle simultaneaously.

[pablo-de-andres]

In GitLab by @urbanmatthias on Mar 16, 2020, 11:55

changed the description