Simon Lin

Agree on relaxation. To be honest, I have always been unable to appreciate why the Service TLV is preferred for adding the unicast address and port. Conceptually, `Service Data` should...

> @simonlingoogle , the idea is that in the infra provided common SRP server case, we want address/port to be part of the common "Service TLV" so if multiple BRs...

I think it's a great idea to allows estimating energy consumption in OTNS. Thanks for the PR. @Vinggui BTW, are we expecting a related PR at OTNS repo too?

> Ok, so now it looks like we have a chicken and the egg situation: Tests seems to be failing because OTNS is doing many warnings, but this is expected...

What's the relationship of this PR to https://github.com/openthread/openthread/pull/7897 ?

> > What's the relationship of this PR to #7897 ? > > Hi @simonlingoogle , The PR #7897 has no direct relation to this PR, nor did I work...

another fail [logs_112214.zip](https://github.com/openthread/openthread/files/7946967/logs_112214.zip)

This has been a long outstanding failure. The test fails when one (or more) SED failed to ping the BR within 3600 seconds. Will take a look.

Need to track [JIRA] (SPEC-1077) Resolving on-link prefix contention on AIL ? @abtink

Seems the SRP server rejects the SRP service registration using port 12341. ``` Oct 20 09:46:54 a3e40dcc3dda otbr-agent[122]: [INFO]-ADPROXY-: Advertise SRP service updates: host=my-host.default.service.arpa. Oct 20 09:46:54 a3e40dcc3dda otbr-agent[122]: [INFO]-ADPROXY-:...