Simon Baird

It occurred to me that we could maybe remove the ThostUploadPlugin entirely when user is downloading the site for local use. I probably won't explore that idea further right now,...

@YakovL FYI. I'm happy to merge and deploy this, but interested in your thoughts on the respecting the `chkHttpReadOnly` setting. FWIW, the old Tiddlyspot used to ignore that and always...

Another idea is to let the site owner choose if they want to respect the user's (i.e. the site reader's) `chkHttpReadOnly` setting or not, but it might not be worth...

I think it makes sense to me. I'm putting `window.readOnly = false` back in as you suggested. I agree we can leave the configurable `chkHttpReadOnly` behavior idea for another day....

I realized this doesn't actually hide the edit buttons for not logged in users, *unless* the person viewing the site has manually set their chkHttpReadOnly to true. Do you think...

Let's merge this anyhow - we can discuss changing the default chkHttpReadOnly later.

> chkHttpReadOnly is true by default in TWC core, so this part works as expected. My mistake, I thought it was false by default. > config.shadowTiddlers.TiddlyHostIsLoggedIn is 'no' I can't...

Yeah, figuring out some smarter caching directives seems like a good idea. It could also check the updated timestamp and give a "304 not modified" if there are really no...

I missed this somehow - apologies for the late response. I'll take a look at this and see if I can reproduce it.

I can't reproduce this in the latest TiddlyWiki, so perhaps it's a TiddlyWiki bug rather than a Tiddlyhost bug. I'm trying it out at https://simon.tiddlyhost.com/#Fields%20with%20numbers%20test with TiddlyWiki 5.2.5.