Simeon David Schaub

I am wondering whether it might even be enough to just overload `+` and scalar multiplication for `ProductTangent` (and perhaps some others ChainRulesCore defines for `AbstractTangent`s). Or would that quickly...

Ah, I completely forgot about that! If you want to give it a go, have a look at the Documenter tests I added here for how to set that up:...

I might have just stumbled upon an example. Using https://github.com/simeonschaub/SchurPolynomials.jl again: ```julia julia> using SchurPolynomials, AbstractAlgebra julia> @descend SchurPolynomials.schur(10, Partition([4, 3, 2, 1])); [...] 85 │ %73 = %new(SchurPolynomials.var"#11#13"{Int64}, _2,...

I recently found this useful, so I updated it and I think it should be pretty much ready now. I only need to figure out how to properly test this.

This is expected. `@code_warntype` gives the IR before optimization, if you want to get the equivalent in Cthulhu you need to pass `optimize=false` (or just press `o`). Perhaps `@descend_code_warntype` should...

Ah, sorry, I missed that!

Yes, that was my eventual goal, but lets see how this goes first.

Can anyone see the actual logs?

I ran this on my machine and it eventually froze, so I suspect this might be an oversubscription issue.

I'm not sure if it's the cause for this particular error, but note that there currently isn't any support for opaque closures in JuliaInterpreter. Would be good to add that...