Matija Šuklje
Matija Šuklje
The `+` syntax has not gone away. It is only that (to accommodate for FSF’s position) the GPL family is using `-only`/`-or-later` instead. All the other licenses that have an...
I see this the same way as you do, @carmenbianca. This seems to be kinda solved in Spec, but would need to be explained in the FAQ.
I think the whole `+` vs `-or-later` and `-only` and which license texts to include will remain confusing for quite some time still. Might make sense to bundle it up...
@matkoniecz AFAIK, under Polish copyright law, you cannot dedicate something to public domain, which is why in that case CC0-1.0 works as a very permissive license instead (and e.g. just...
@matkoniecz I understand your predicament. And as best practices like REUSE slowly catch on, such issues will pop up. If a repo starts afresh. In the case you describe and...
The final result should be 4, yes.
For practical reasons, I would prefer №3. It is more complex, but that complexity does bring with it flexibility to make REUSE actually useful in more complex (dare I say...
When it comes to **YAML flavours** I think all should be OK – I guess we would use an external parser and linter anyway, right? For files that `reuse.yaml` should...
Great catch, @Jayman2000! What you write makes sense to me. It does provide some extra complication, but seems worth it to me in order to avoid future issues.
Quite the opposite, I’m afraid, @pietroalbini. There are several points where DEP5 (mostly, but not only, due to historical reasons) differs from SPDX and REUSE. To use DEP5 in REUSE...