Replace unsupported k8s version for kind v0.30.0
Summary
Replace the 1.30.x k8s version with newly supported 1.34.x for use with kind clusters. Update the chainguard-dev/actions/setup-kind Action to use the most recent version that supports v1.34.
Release Note
Documentation
Codecov Report
:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 29.52%. Comparing base (ea54b96) to head (7f53c25).
:warning: Report is 32 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1898 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 42.78% 29.52% -13.26%
===========================================
Files 121 122 +1
Lines 8994 7254 -1740
===========================================
- Hits 3848 2142 -1706
- Misses 4791 4883 +92
+ Partials 355 229 -126
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@cpanato could you help us to replace the vi checks for the unsupported k8s versions?
@malancas It looks like there are some errors when using Kubernetes v1.34. Have you looked at them ?
@malancas It looks like there are some errors when using Kubernetes v1.34. Have you looked at them ?
I'll take a look
@malancas The DCO check is failing :/ https://github.com/sigstore/policy-controller/pull/1898/checks?check_run_id=55202289704
@malancas The DCO check is failing :/ https://github.com/sigstore/policy-controller/pull/1898/checks?check_run_id=55202289704
Should be fixed now
@cpanato whenever you get some time, could you review https://github.com/sigstore/community/pull/669 ?
@malancas once this PR gets merged https://github.com/sigstore/community/pull/669, please rebase your pr.
@malancas once this PR gets merged sigstore/community#669, please rebase your pr.
The pull request is now up to date. It looks like all checks are now passing other than the codecov coverage decrease, which we can address in a follow up. I think we are ready to merge.