Thomas Sigdestad

This continues to be a problem for us. Today, we run the following command to clean the dirs, after running vacuum. Could we have a separate step that performs something...

Sounds like a plan, but why not start by implemeting it as an app, then it can be added to core when it is mature?

How do we currently control that?

I think I understand the purpose of the task, but I am not sure if I understand "how" we should do this? What will be the result of such a...

I like this approach, especially cool if we could have apps for the various "target" metric systems.

Let's do it!

It is mostly useful in migration processes AFAIK, unless we find a way to upgrade without dump/load. So problem is if the current disk is not big enough and similar....

I guess we can look into this as part of XP8. Ability to perform upgrades in a smoother way seems to be relevant anyhow

For attatchment renaming, the problem is to keep any attatchmentUploader fields in synch (linked). Do we want to deal with this, if so, how?

For media, I guess we can drop this update - as image URL etc now only uses the media name, not the attatchment. But what does mediaUrl do?