Results 238 comments of Chris Mullins

Just tried flashing and it seems to have worked without any fiddling. I did flash the new version I just released so possible (although unlikely) that something in one of...

This should hopefully be resolved in v1.11.0. I split aliases out of the settings file.

Same here. My stacktrace: ``` /usr/local/var/rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/cmdparse-3.0.1/lib/cmdparse.rb:796:in `initialize': wrong number of arguments (given 2, expected 0) (ArgumentError) from /usr/local/var/rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/juicer-1.2.0/lib/juicer/cli.rb:16:in `new' from /usr/local/var/rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/juicer-1.2.0/lib/juicer/cli.rb:16:in `parse' from /usr/local/var/rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/juicer-1.2.0/lib/juicer/cli.rb:37:in `run' from /usr/local/var/rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/juicer-1.2.0/bin/juicer:6:in `' from /usr/local/var/rbenv/versions/2.3.0/bin/juicer:23:in...

Same here with a VPC endpoint for API gateway. The error internally appears to be because headers flask-lambda is expecting are not set by the upstream: ``` [ERROR] KeyError: 'HTTP_X_FORWARDED_PORT'...

Ah, yeah. I've heard that other people have had trouble with this library on Windows. The second problem you're seeing sounds like it's not finding a device through discovery. There...

Hi, sorry for the late response here. It's possible the device you have is using a different discovery protocol. The ones I've messed with support a UDP broadcast discovery on...

Which device are you using? I'm using [this thing](https://www.amazon.com/LEDENET-Controller-Android-Smartphone-Control/dp/B00MDKOSN0). Could be that the TCP APIs differ slightly.

Ah, interesting. Let me know what you find! Would love to incorporate more devices if it's not too hard. Packet structure for this project is here: https://github.com/sidoh/ledenet_api/tree/master/lib/ledenet/packets

Ah, yeah. This definitely makes sense. If this ends up being the difference, probably wouldn't be too hard to incorporate it without muddling the interface. Maybe works out to be...

Yeah, I think that makes sense. Guess there are two high-level approaches I'd consider: 1. Add another parameter to API initialization [here](https://github.com/sidoh/ledenet_api/blob/master/lib/ledenet/api.rb#L8) 2. Pull out common parts of API, stuff...