sideshowbarker

Danny, thanks much, and congrats on landing your first docs change here — welcome aboard 🎉

See the related issue at https://github.com/orgs/mdn/discussions/264 (about what the MDN URLs should look like)

The cause is that somebody added those URLs to the BCD sources as mdn_url values even though none of those pages actually exist.

We should get `capture` into the HTML standard itself. In general, all elements and attributes for the HTML language should be available in the HTML standard itself, even if some...

> I'd prefer we figure out some consistent terminology across WHATWG standards (harmonize legacy/deprecated/obsolete; it seems historical already got removed) and settle for inline annotations. So features are still described...

> Would obsolete elements also be "discouraged"? Currently the spec says obsolete elements and attributes must not be used (but doesn't seem to say that APIs in that section must...

> Hmm I just realized that wpt-stability-checker in web-platform-tests uses links in summary. Maybe it should be allowed? Maybe so, given we know at least one real-world use case for...

Closing for lack of necessary details. @alfasou If you can provide the details in https://github.com/validator/validator/issues/new?assignees=&labels=bug&template=incorrect-validation.md&title= we could reopen this.

Howdy Jens — The checker includes full support for RDFa, and at https://www.w3.org/TR/html-rdfa/#extensions-to-the-html5-syntax the HTML+RDFa spec say this: > the following RDFa attributes are allowed on all elements in the...

> Is there any checking on the _values_ of these attributes? https://github.com/validator/validator/blob/main/schema/html5/rdfa.rnc includes some microsyntax/datatype checking of certain values to ensure that they’re either an RDFa “term”, CURIE, “safe” CURIE...