Chris Shucksmith

I think you are right, although we don't have a test case with an `OrderedModelAdmin` that includes inlines that are themselves `OrderedInlineModelAdminMixin` to verify. In particular, our [`OrderedInlineMixin.get_urls()`](https://github.com/django-ordered-model/django-ordered-model/blob/master/ordered_model/admin.py#L165) does not...

OK it was not what I thought - I can't see a bug our side, so could be in django-unfold. Either way getting the MRO right is essential here and...

While it's nice to document ideas, this isn't an actionable issue (bug report) with the software, so I will close it.

An earlier version had functionality in `OrderedModelManager` although that has now moved to `OrderedQuerySet`, so perhaps we can drop this warning. Or as you suggest we could overload `as_manager` to...

Since there is no definition of how the 'respect to' groups themselves are ordered (or guarantee that they are in a stable way), this isn't an operation we could support.

There is no requirement that the 'parent' is ordered.

The blocker to making a new release is the unfinished work on https://github.com/django-ordered-model/django-ordered-model/pull/295#issuecomment-1930368591 - without it there is a performance issue in some use cases, and it's not straightforward.

I've release `3.8.0-alpha`, which includes everything from master, and gives us chance for wider testing of what we. `pip install django-ordered-model==3.8.0a0`

This looks like a good fix

Hi @a-ruban thanks for the report. Do you think that you understand the issue sufficiently to raise a PR against the test suite to add a failing test? If so...