cabboose

I'm not sure if you've run into this issue, but arc is not compatible with concurrency. If you allocate ref objects on one thread and consume them rapidly in parallel...

I think you misunderstand; as with all things to do with concurrency/parallelism, the undefined behaviour still exists. If you try with more threads on a MPMC queue you will more...

https://github.com/nim-works/loony/tree/main/failtests You can run these tests to demonstrate the behaviour. Let me know what you think.

``` ================== WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=2289) Write of size 8 at 0x7b30000000a8 by thread T2 (mutexes: write M7): #0 sendMpmc__OOZthreadingZchannels_232 (tchannels_simple_BDEB89ECC21CBB3EBB997D5C2ADCC5280B56155A+0x1ba84) #1 channelSend__tchannels95simple_194 (tchannels_simple_BDEB89ECC21CBB3EBB997D5C2ADCC5280B56155A+0x1e579) #2 send__tchannels95simple_178 (tchannels_simple_BDEB89ECC21CBB3EBB997D5C2ADCC5280B56155A+0x1e83f) #3 secondWorker__tchannels95simple_208...

Please do not assume things like where the issue came from! This issue was discovered on a [static array](https://github.com/shayanhabibi/evilcanary) MPMC. I never referenced loony until you gave me inaccurate and...

Incorrect. That is not why I am "nagging". You can read what I have said multiple times to understand where the issue is. I don't have any issues with the...

Better that it doesn't do this by default, because it stays true to the principle of a primitive. If you wanted it to accept any modifier in any order: Could...

I see the point regarding whether the current implementation is overly opinionated. With regards to this, it should be trivial to remove order on modifiers from what I saw in...

Your intended behaviour is more likely to be achieved using a relative value like '+=360' instead of [0,360].

 The example demonstrated here shows some more peculiarities. The closing of the content/virtual box will refresh the group label it seems. Update: This smells like an issue to do...