Shashi Gowda
Shashi Gowda
> Good point. I think it's important to be able to have symbolic expressions containing arbitrary function calls. This might require something like an IRTools dynamo, since there's no way...
Pinging @zenna here because he has thought about this a lot. This may require #70, and #71 could make inverting possible for a broader set of julia functions. @zenna could...
> Neat. This package could be useful if it helps with some algebraic simplification which at one point I was using Sympy to help with. This package should help here,...
I just added this as a feature in https://github.com/JuliaSymbolics/Symbolics.jl/pull/428/files#diff-77fb4c57855640a409f9ed203acd1f1044b650fed1e72ab63a79aba46c42fd4eR186 it should get released in the next couple of days!
Hi @halleysfifthinc I know this should have run on its own, but could you try again after running `]build WebIO` and restarting the Jupyter server?
How about having a command registry that is global?
In that case, how about allowing a mechanism to inject a bunch of functions as commands? We'll need some kind of way for PlotlyJS to expose a function that does...
Or actually we can just have PlotlyJS tach on a bunch of commands, such as: ```js this.CommandSets.Plotly = {command1: ...} ``` inside `onimport`
In that case I guess we can just delete the CommandSets feature, and allow PlotlyJS.jl itself to simply load its own JS module and use it.