Shargon
Shargon
> @shargon how about roman's comment: [#3385 (comment)](https://github.com/neo-project/neo/pull/3385#discussion_r1696377899) Map was before, and was removed because a review https://github.com/neo-project/neo/pull/3385#discussion_r1665156066
> > merge? > > [#3385 (comment)](https://github.com/neo-project/neo/pull/3385#discussion_r1696381840) > > Non-standard verification scripts are still not supported. You mean without a contract?
> Yes. Like in #3209. It's done in neo-go? i can't find it
> We may merge #3385 as it is now and move non-standard verification scripts support to another issue. I think it's acceptable way since #3385 contains everything that's required except...
> Anyway you can do this [#3481 (comment)](https://github.com/neo-project/neo/issues/3481#issue-2511922347) in a different pr please, this is for a different thing
Is good for optimizations
But why not something like, requirements: Witness, None, ReadOnly? we should try to join with the readOnly flag
Also we need to do a regular test, to ensure that the 21 candidates have a node, currently is not mandatory, and if the role change, we can have view...
> A proof of life as a seed node on mainnet is also very important. A watch only node that seeds the network. Totally agree