Document the comment support?

[LitoMore]

It appears that the .node-version file does not support comments.

How about documenting it in the table?

[shadowspawn]

It appears that the .node-version file does not support comments.

Yes. I don't think comments are widely supported.

How about documenting it in the table?

I only want to document widely used or widely supported features in the table. (For interest, I was not planning to add "partial" versions but it turned out most implementations did support it.)

Were you hoping comment support was actually common? Do you use something which does support comments in .node-version?

[LitoMore]

I only use fnm, and it does not support comments.

I was expecting comments in the file since the project practice is to add a license header to all files.

[sdavids]

Useful for REUSE compatibility without an explicit entry in REUSE.toml.

[shadowspawn]

I have added some comments about other features which are not widely supported, including "comments" themselves. 😄

https://github.com/shadowspawn/node-version-usage/commit/ad291caf580a94bce1405053dfc1b60119e90c55