Samuel Gaist
Samuel Gaist
@Ph0tonic, while it was originally geared towards OAuth providers, it something that could indeed live in JupyterHub since it also supports other providers as it is not tied to the...
Hi guys, Sorry for the late reply. The plan sounds good to me. @manics would that repo be under the jupyterhub organisation or my own space ? I have done...
@manics You're welcome ! `jupyterhub-contrib` sounds good. I was thinking about something similar so it's great to see the idea was already floating around. I'll create the repo during the...
Hi, As promised: https://github.com/idiap/multiauthenticator @Ph0tonic: thanks for the reviews and suggestions done here, I integrated your scope fixes already. And I have found a simpler way for the configuration issue....
@manics there might already be some logic in [build.py](https://github.com/jupyterhub/binderhub/blob/main/binderhub/build.py#L330) that could be reused for getting the IP of the pod we would like to use. On a side note, AFAIK,...
Noted and starting :-)
* From the looks of it, the `static-analysis.cmake` contains a more aggressive configuration for cppcheck than the one I have been using. Currently my command is `cppcheck -i ./build --enable=warning,style,performance,portability...
There's something that is escaping me with regard to the `sinsp` object initialization. It seems that when the webserver is started, which happens very late in the process, said `sinsp`...
> Samuel, pulled your branch and wanted to test drive it, but it doesn't compile. Mind fixing the build? Thank you! I'll review the changes then. In addition, we still...