Steven Fackler

These images aren't pushed directly - it's managed through the [docker-library/official-images](https://github.com/docker-library/official-images) repository.

It's done by opening a pull request to that repository. For example https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/5048

Deleting and redownloading the index isn't going to change what's inside of it.

We'd definitely like to have them - the only blocker is figuring out how to make them actually work. There's an attempt here for example: https://github.com/alexcrichton/docker-rust/commit/494237c6d6867cd696fa1f3c4bc1ec31c5f85d0d

Awesome! I cargo-culted a bunch of the setup here from the python and golang images, so they'd be good places to look for Windows setup as well.

> I mean, do you see an alpine image for rust? The only reason there's no alpine image is that there isn't an x86_64-unknown-linux-musl rustc build yet. #10

That just generates the metadata blob that goes over to the docker-library/official-images repo - it doesn't need to run in the same OS as the docker image or anything.

Similarly, update.sh can create a Dockerfile for a Windows image without being run on Windows. Bashbrew is here: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/tree/master/bashbrew

I don't have strong preferences on the CI setup - but presumably the other official image repos that have Windows images should have something to base the work here off...

I mean, the only thing blocking this issue is someone getting a Dockerfile that works. If you have those, then feel free to open a PR.