Alex Hansen
Alex Hansen
Tracking: - [x] Rework namespaces to have hierarchy (#1415) - [x] Allow implicit namespaces (#1416) - [x] Export statements (#1453) - [x] Import statements - [x] Local external package dependencies...
Merged the import and export branches together, but this comment still needs a response (cc @minestarks): https://github.com/microsoft/qsharp/pull/1469#discussion_r1617654530
It could make sense to approach this issue by implementing generic UDTs, making ranges generic, and then re-implementing Int ranges, as well as BigInt ranges, in that new Range type.
Hi @Regenhardt! Thanks for the issue filing. I think this is going to be somewhat addressed by #493, where we will introduce implicit namespaces based on your project structure.
Closing as #493 addresses this, albeit with a different design.
Hi @tcNickolas -- is this issue still open, or can we close it?
We need to decide if this should be a comment, attribute, or something else. Tagging as designed needed for that purpose.
Is this issue still up to date? It might be worth breaking out into smaller issues to tackle in the future.
I was referring to the items without issues already created for them, primarily the _Debug Cleanup Task_ section.
@DmitryVasilevsky could you follow up on this and clarify if this was an intentional library change?