Sergiu Waxmann

@kumarneeraj2005 The size shown in the screenshot you shared represents the size of the model + all exported formats. Just by looking at the screenshot, I imagine the first two...

@kumarneeraj2005 Looks like inference is working correctly for the model ID you provided. API response: ```json { "data": [ { "class": 0, "confidence": 0.952075719833374, "keypoints": [ 0.596757173538208, 0.6352880597114563, 1.0, 0.6028388142585754,...

@kumarneeraj2005 What do you mean by "error handling is ineffective"? Can you maybe explain what is the issue you are facing (Minimal Reproducible Example) and share one of the images...

@kumarneeraj2005 I can confirm this issue (POSE model):  Expected behavior (DETECT model):  We will fix this issue in the next release (following days) - will keep you updated....

@suren1986 The POSE preview issue was solved and the fix will be deployed in the next release (by the looks of it, tomorrow by EOD). If you are having a...

@vwyLss Can you check now? Last checkpoint should be epoch 125.

@vwyLss You're welcome! 🚀

Hello @seniorb! I just tried viewing Roboflow segment datasets in Ultralytics HUB and it works fine on my end. Maybe you can try removing the Roboflow Workspace from Settings or...

@kumarneeraj2005 @suren1986 @sctcorp01 New release 🚀 Inference and exports should work fine now.

@kumarneeraj2005 I can’t reproduce this issue, but I will investigate further. When you export your model, the weights used for inference do not change. Are you sure you were receiving...