Sergi Siso

Turns out the naming is not the only API specific aspect of the transformations. There is also the fact that they create NemoLoop constructs and at the end of the...

There is basic functionality to with the `CodeBlock.get_symbol_names()` method. I thought about differentiating between read and write, but it is not trivial (or simply not possible? for the generic case)....

I am happy to discuss this next week. There are a few things about CodeBlock symbols that are not properly designed (e.g. a symbol.rename that is also in a codeblock...

Some ideas: - Do we need them as specific nodes? Maybe being just new operators like the other Fortran intrinsics would be enough for them not being in a codeblock....

I like the general direction. I also prefer option 1 rather than 2. The validation of the supplied arguments that you do inside create is something that at some point...

I agree, the frontend could associate comments to its first following statement if they are a full line, or lhs statement if they are inline. But in the first PR...

@arporter @rupertford This is ready for the first review

@arporter This is ready for next review (CI permitting).

In #1899 I needed to compare routines (therefore schedules) and I implemented an initial version of the symbol_table equality operator (which is not complete). To finish it we need the...

@arporter This is ready for a first review.