RageLtMan
RageLtMan
Thank you for deep diving the nonsense @smcintyre-r7. I owe you a new dry suit and air tank as i doubt any amount of sanitization will get that smell out....
@cgranleese-r7 how did you do that on Windows? Windows doesn't _do_ SCTP :grin:. Is py bringing its own SCTP impl atop UDP or something?
No worries boss, got me hoping there for a sec :).
If [this is what they're using](https://github.com/rprichard/winpty), then it appears to not have been updated for 5y. I suppose we could "promote migration to a safer mechanism" by finding & disclosing...
This sounds like a matrix job for buildbots: 1. check if `sctp` is compiled (is there a module, is it builtin?). 2. check if unprivileged auto-load of `sctp` works on...
I feel like i should be sending :bouquet: to @smcintyre-r7 and @adfoster-r7 for the insane amount of QA work which this required. Thanks a ton to everyone who helped get...
Thanks folks, much appreciate the integration effort. Aside from raw IP sockets, are there any major OSI3 or OSI4 types remaining, or are we down to higher-layer types now?
Thank you, now lets see how long it takes the blue side vendors to start reporting (increased) SCTP use in the wild :smile:
@szaimen - can confirm the issue persists in `25.0.3`: ```json { "reqId": "Y9W9tLxGSergDnL49_CWOwAAABE", "level": 3, "time": "2023-01-29T00:28:37+00:00", "remoteAddr": "56.220.245.121", "user": "FD4D640E-29AA-4B1D-9378-DDBC90F6C642", "app": "PHP", "method": "PUT", "url": "/index.php/apps/files_external/globalstorages/10", "message": "Undefined array...
Downgrading client libraries is probably not an option in corporate environments where patch levels have to be maintained at current (or at least "not flagging as being vulnerable to high...