sei-eschwartz

@sei-gwassermann Can you comment here so I can assign this to you?

Done but I can't assign you to the other issues unless you comment there I think.

@sei-gwassermann Ping

> It's sometimes used to invalidate pointers: Yes, I could see that happening in theory. But does production code actually do this? Couldn't a compiler optimize that write away if...

Yes, I understand. But after the object has been destructed, reading from the object is undefined behavior, so the compiler is free to optimize it away. And if the reads...

@sei-ccohen Is there any point to leaving this open?

What would you want a member at offset 10 to be named? `mbr_a`?

This seems reasonable to me. The main disadvantage is that it changes the JSON format. But it probably should have been this way all along.

Thanks for sharing that link. I agree that we should reuse IDA's naming conventions when importing into IDA

I think the corner case that influenced this was to show uses from the derived class of a member defined in the base class. @sei-ccohen Is that what you remember?