sei-eschwartz

@sei-ccohen Is there a reason why we don't have a rule or guess stating if a method calls delete it isn't a constructor?

@Trass3r We changed a bunch of rules relating to destructor detection recently. You may want to retry this.

Forgot we had access to MSDN. VS 2008 is indeed there.

Yes, that is a good point. We should probably ignore the size for the `[]` variants because there's no easy way to know how many objects there are (right?)

Thanks! This is very helpful. It looks like some of this is documented [here](https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/master/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp#L175) We should definitely add a rule to detect virtual bases from the complete destructor! That sounds...

Well, if you have any other insights or suggestions we're all ears. @sei-ccohen I just looked at our test cases and we don't define a custom delete operator for any...

Thanks! These look extremely helpful. Improving the prolog performance is definitely not for the faint of heart. We've cleaned up a lot of bad/inefficient code over the last few releases....

@sei-gwassermann Ping

There are a few options. I think the easiest one would be to filter the `symbolClass` facts for `xercesc_2_6` from your facts file. The other option would be to extract...

> May be worth noting that xerces and one other library seem to make up every single `symbolClass` fact? Is that normal? It's not abnormal. > Is there any documentation...