sehe

> Removed dependency of boost. You might mention what you replaced it with

Probably a duplicate of https://github.com/boostorg/json/issues/480

Is there a specification for this? E.g. do you have a sample of such a table if you have done so manually?

> (esp with sorting options) ?

My WIP is in this PR: https://github.com/boostorg/beast/pull/2381 I'll make some time soon to finish work @vinniefalco

+1 for short examples, command line drivers with option parsing muddy the code (depending a bit on what they're used for). We can assume people know how to do that....

Just replicating my review comment on the topic: > In contrast to others, I think the choice of Nomenclature, namely URL > everywhere _except_ in the grammar domain (the parse...

I fear the general answer here is: it's a precondition and adding explicit checks would penalizing all usage of the algorithm. Does the return value satisfy your expectations? > If...

I don't consider it a bug either. I'm not fond of disallowing implicit conversions. Like I argue [in my answer](https://stackoverflow.com/a/62986395/85371), very similar situations would benefit from implicit conversions. The fact...

@Kojoley You say that as if it is a fact. I can see myself parsing input where fractions are admissable, but I'm not interested in them. Not quite astonishing to...