siddharth

I think adding this feature to coming will just require creating new patterns files for each pattern mentioned in minesstub. Do we want a separate module(like repairability) or do we...

Some thoughts on the module designs. Note: this is just to get a discussion started. - a new mode type named? - a new CLI argument called "repair-tool-name" - There...

Cool. I will try to avoid the use of "checks" and if they are required I would most probably make an issue here to discuss including such features in the...

#74 represents the ongoing work. The current flow of the module is as follows: - apply FineGrainDifftAnalyzer to the input - extract all the patterns that need to be mined...

Does an output like this make sense and is it okay? repairability is an array so that a single revision can be classified into multiple tools. ``` { "instances": [...

Hi @martinezmatias, If I'm correct `IntermediateResultProcessorCallback` is called after execution of all the analyzers and before the execution of output processors? Therefore, `IntermediateResultProcessorCallback` will be an appropriate way to implement...

Cool!

Hey @martinezmatias and @monperrus , What do you think about how to proceed with the quantitative analysis of repairability module, in particular, the false-positives and true-negative cases? The current dataset...

Doesn't `-input files` do kind of the same thing? Though, it needs to be encapsulated within three folders with a particular folder hierarchy. What args are `-input` and `-location` supposed...

> In fact, maybe we should rename 'input' by 'inputtype' (I will do it after the conference). Yeah. I think that same I made an issue for the same #64...