Sergey G. Brester

> If you mean "take the low-order 64-bits from the 128-bits output"... Why not both (with any mathematical expression in-between)... ```cpp uint64_t h[2] = (uint64_t*)mmh128_res; /* either simply sum */...

> I wonder if your requirements might be strict enough that you want a stronger hash function. > My intuition says that shifting by only one bit to XOR, after...

For people having similar issue and want to repair either: Disclamer: *⚠️ Only follow any given step if you completely understand it and its implications for your SD-card or Pi....

I've provided artificial PR sebres/tcl#4, that fully implements this (together with [TIP #302](www.tcl.tk/cgi-bin/tct/tip/302.html) and many, many other things. If I get a bit time, and TCT does not see absolute...

I've extended test-cases a bit, and have provided a performance comparison for above-mentioned branch, if interesting https://github.com/sebres/tcl/pull/4#issuecomment-312252977

Reintegrated resp. back-ported as 8.6 based branch in [sebres-8-6-event-perf-branch](http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline?r=sebres-8-6-event-perf-branch&nd&n=200)

> I hope everybody is well and safe I've got recently a message from Peter (@resuna): > Weathered so far so good... > Everyone at Flightaware has now checked in...

I've the Intention also, but I've already implemented both (scan and format) it in pure-C (also with bison, similar to `tclGetDate.y`), however in my own tcl-fork (tclSE-mod - mix from...

> first reviewed and accepted into trunk by the Tcl core team I belong to tcl-core team already several years, and I know unfortunately good enough how "fast" some enhancements...

> easy to make clock scan an incredible amount faster if you break backwards compatibility. 1. I did not. It is currently not completely backwards compatible because of bug fixing...