Sebb

Yes. This PR does handle that specific syntax, i.e. a pair of single-quotes outside a quoted string. However, SDF also allows such a pair inside a quoted string. For example...

This PR was raised as a possible solution which is compatible with *existing* test cases. It does not make LANG compatible with SDF. Nor is it a nice solution; the...

As per my comment on #426, there should be no padding at all. Having a maximum is a separate feature, and a sensible value will depend on the screen width.

I don't think it makes sense to match by subject even if there is a reply prefix indicator. If there are two identical subjects, they are likely to both get...

There will only be 100 unconnected threads if the mailers are broken and don't provide Reference headers. Are there many such broken clients? Anyway I think it's better to have...

If a clustered setup can generate copies of e-mails that are not identical, then surely that needs to be fixed rather than munging the original e-mail?

However correcting e-mails changes the hash and therefore the Permalink, which can affect existing databases. If a database is reloaded, it looks like any existing entries with incorrect EOLs will...

I'm not sure I understand the behaviour of the redundant setup. I assume that if the same message is presented to the main and backup archivers that they will generate...

I agree that the regex looks wrong. As it stands, it will accept any salt that has at least one alphanumeric character after the $[56]$ prefix. However, the Javadoc for...

I've added some more tests to CryptTest based on the Javadoc. Some fail if the RE is terminated after the salt characters. The Javadoc says that '$' will terminate the...