esprima-dotnet
esprima-dotnet copied to clipboard
Fix class-related parsing problems
Assigning to myself as work started with https://github.com/sebastienros/esprima-dotnet/pull/248 , trying to get problems to zero.
/cc @adams85 @Xicy please keep refactoring to minimum when it comes to class related things, small bug fixes and tweaks OK, I'll manage. Also you can raise ideas/tasks to be included in v3 milestone I've created.
And of course @jogibear9988 , see above, sorry I missed you - you three have been most active recently - and help is much appreciated! Refer to family and friends to get even more traction 😉
And of course @jogibear9988 , see above, sorry I missed you - you three have been most active recently - and help is much appreciated! Refer to family and friends to get even more traction 😉
Your welcome, I learn too much thing from yours. I had not time for these week also I did not looks @adams85 and @jogibear9988 mentions, sorry for that.
/cc @adams85 @Xicy please keep refactoring to minimum when it comes to class related things, small bug fixes and tweaks OK, I'll manage. Also you can raise ideas/tasks to be included in v3 milestone I've created.
If I have enough time, I will try to implement Span #22. If you want, I will wait for the future release.
I've never looked what problem still exist... Only if someone mentioned some issues, I looked after them. :-)
I still have some pull request I need to look after: https://github.com/node-projects/esprima-next/issues/24
and also I need to look at all pull requests after #222, wich I need to add also to esprima-next
please keep refactoring to minimum when it comes to class related things
May I proceed with https://github.com/sebastienros/esprima-dotnet/issues/264 or would I rather wait until this one is resolved?
@adams85 please go ahead!
should we close this? i think most works at the moment
I think we should keep this open just a little bit longer. Probably when allow-list.txt
does not have class-related relaxations this should be quite complete 🙂
I believe this is completed now, right?
Some validation still missing like hoisting scope names but this can be closed.