Bas Couwenberg

Or rebase to exclude the .po changes?

> ``` > /usr/local/include/mapnik/params.hpp:58:49: error: no matching function for call to ‘mapbox::util::variant::variant(long long int)’ > ``` This error also prevents the Debian package from building successfully as reported in #279....

See the patches in the Debian & Fedora packages: https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/python-mapnik/-/tree/master/debian/patches?ref_type=heads https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-mapnik/tree/ Also note the commit used for the packages, this is an older one. I never got the package to...

You need the patch from Fedora, see: https://github.com/mapnik/python-mapnik/issues/279#issuecomment-2525056436

I have refreshed the [patches in the Debian package](https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/python-mapnik/-/tree/master/debian/patches?ref_type=heads), but haven't bothered to rebase my branches here as I haven't been able to get the current state of master to...

Updated patches to apply to master @ https://github.com/mapnik/python-mapnik/commit/10315a6d898ed341f5df5975395f3dc67814ebf6: * https://github.com/mapnik/python-mapnik/pull/267 * https://github.com/mapnik/python-mapnik/pull/274 * https://github.com/mapnik/python-mapnik/pull/275 This conflicts with the changes in #274, ideally the pkg-config changes are merged first, and then...

> As far as I understand, @sebastic manages the releases on the Debian side if I understand https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/postgis correctly, so maybe they could throw a pointer or two what should...

> > > > (debian doesn't have qwt for Qt6 and likely won't have it for trixie) > > > > > > Why not ? Why not proposing a...

As reported in [Debian Bug #1055716](https://bugs.debian.org/1055716), this now causes the build to fail: > python-mapnik ftbfs with Python 3.12: > ``` > [...] > src/python_grid_utils.cpp: In function ‘void mapnik::grid2utf(const T&,...

My contribution is trivial and therefor likely not copyrightable, but I consent to relicensing none the less.