Sean Whalen

@rodpayne I'm curious about your thoughts on this https://github.com/nhairs/parsedmarc-fork/issues/1

Closing per the discussion here

Yeah, so many people use this project for such a variety of different use cases that I'd rather not break existing functionality. Similar to why I want to be so...

I got excited when I saw this subject thinking this was a PR. 😝 This is absolutely needed. It's a mess already! I'm just not sure what is the right...

I just reread your post. That design could work!

Thinking about it more, having all options as a config object would break things for people who are using specific functions of `parsedmarc` as a library. How about a config...

Ideally it should be both, with some core functions used for parsing reports usable as a library, with some parts on top of that like mailbox monitoring being standalone. Separating...

Just new getting around to looking at this. Dynaconf looks really nice!

This might be fixed now

Thanks for the detailed explanation.