Sean McLeod

> Sorry, I have overreacted there but I'd really like the discussion to focus on the reason why we are using `vOmegaLocal` and whether it is correct or not. No...

> but can the aircraft be initialized to some rates at the poles where the frame is not the local frame? Current frame options for the setting of initial rates....

Sounds good to me.

So looking at `socket()` and `accept()` documentation for Linux and presumably for other Unix based OS, it looks like -1 is returned for both to indicate failure. Linux socket() -...

When I run the `scripts\c172_runway_at_rest_cg_shift.xml` locally here on Windows I don't see the issue. I think I saw you making a comment on one of the commits that you also...

Hmm, I wasn't running it from python, I ran `jsbsim.exe` directly. Just trying `python CheckScripts.py` now it doesn't look like `fpectl` is a standard installed module? ```sh PS C:\source\jsbsim\tests> python...

Ah, I did run `python CheckScripts.py` in the `tests` folder, however I hadn't performed a `cmake` build, just the Visual Studio build of the project which only builds `jsbsim.exe`. >...

So how come I didn't see the error when I ran `.\Release\JSBSim.exe --script=scripts\c172_runway_at_rest_cg_shift.xml`? Since I wasn't running it via the python test, rather running the `JSBSim.exe` were the set of...

Taking a quick look I see `FGLinearization.h` and `FGLinearization.cpp` are in the current source tree in the `initialization` directory, however they are not referenced in `CMakeLists.txt` so they aren't included...

Also searching for `FGLinearization` in the Advanced Trimming Branch see https://github.com/arktools/jsbsim/search?q=FGLinearization&unscoped_q=FGLinearization comes up without any hits at all. I was trying to see how the linearization code is typically called.