Stephan Druskat

I'd like to help if I can, but - same as you - I can't say when I'd have the time right now.

A fix has been implemented in https://github.com/Grokzen/pykwalify/pull/119 and works in the http://github.com/sdruskat/pykwalifire fork 1.7.0.

Hi @renefritze, and thanks for opening this issue. Indeed, this would make it much easier to use! If you can help hands-on, please feel free to get started. We can,...

@renefritze Great, thanks! Your help is much appreciated. > I'd be happy to, come second week of September (after pre-vacation crunch and actual vacation smile ). Perfect. Enjoy your vacation...

Set up https://github.com/citation-file-format/cff-validator-python for this and invited René as maintainer.

@bielsnohr Correct, in theory at least, because `cffconvert` isn't yet updated to use `1.2.0` as far as I know. I think there is use in having a dedicated validation package...

> AFAICT `cffconvert` does not yet allow to select which cff schema version to validate against. Is that planned? This could be important for projects I guess. `cffconvert` branches validation...

> That's even better/easier to use for us. So for me there's no need to split the validator script into that new repo any more. If you agree, we can...

Created https://github.com/citation-file-format/cff-converter-python/issues/283 based on this last comment, but cffconvert has supported 1.2.0 for a good wee while now, and so I'm closing this issue :).

Hi Katrin, Thanks. Yes, 1. and 2. are covered. Implementing 3. *directly* (e.g., for Zotero) is future work still, hope to be able to make some progress during the [RSE18...