Scott O'Hara

This appears to still be an issue when testing with Firefox 65.0.2 and JAWS 2019

pointing to this file with the .tentative in the name or without? and if it was tentative would then the expectation be to make another PR to change that when...

we had discussed images with alternative text being allowed. i think that might just be a miss. We had talked about how it could be problematic if people used images...

@annevk excellent, seems we're on the same page then. again, i think that's a mistake in relaying what had been discussed. an option should absolutely be able to contain non-decorative...

i don't see the downside of calling this out. Even if just briefly and cross linking over to https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/images.html#alt for the more detailed requirements for when an `alt` is necessary.

just talked with @josepharhar about this, and per the feedback in this thread we are instead thinking to drop the explicit mention of decorative images from the content model entirely....

> Thanks scott!! I created a spec PR here: #10586 thanks Joey. That looks like it's going in the right direction to me. And so long as it's good with...

understand the feedback about no span outside of options - but not sure why it wouldn't be allowed within options? Or is that a miss that it's not listed along...

@nt1m good point about not wanting to special case, completely agree. There definitely could be benefit to doing this for other inert nodes, especially if they represent other types of...

Reading through the other thread, I'd prefer this approach of an opt in instead of just overwriting heading levels. The only question I have is what is the expectation for...