Anthony Scopatz

So it turns out that `$XONSH_SHOW_TRACEBACK` only affects tracebacks that are handled with `tools.print_exception()`. This does not include all raise-statements that may be executed by the executor. Grepping through the...

@jaraco - what is your `xonfig` say?

Hmmm I am really unsure of what is going on here.

Thanks @CJ-Wright! I am +1 on this idea. It should probably follow the usual subprocess parsing conventions.

Hi @mikicz - Thanks for bringing this up. This is actually a case where the bash alias is a not a valid xonsh alias. Specifically, subproc terminating syntax such as...

@wreed4 I don't know of anyone working on this at the moment, but if someone wanted to PR more sophisticated alias resolution, I would be happy to review it.

This has some very stange behavior with the test case of `alias t="echo A && echo B"`

Yes, this would be great to have!

OOf, yeah, I didn't think to implement this. Though I bet the following does work. ``` @foo!() def bar(): .... ```

Hi @t184256 - thanks for bringing this up! I think this might be an oversight more that a question. Your workaround certainly is effective. For Tab completion, the code to...