s2i-nodejs-container icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
s2i-nodejs-container copied to clipboard

NodeJS images based on Red Hat Software Collections and intended for OpenShift and general usage, that provide a platform for building and running NodeJS applications. Users can choose between Red Hat...

Results 65 s2i-nodejs-container issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

Monorepo is becoming more and more popular repo style in Node.js ecosystem. It support the developers could arrange the packages as they want and link them together. The current s2i...

I have noticed that the RHEL8 documentation for the minimal image does not mention the specifics of the minimal image - it seems to be a copy of the documentation...

I've noticed that the resulting s2i image starts the Node.js application using [npm start](https://github.com/sclorg/s2i-nodejs-container/blob/master/12/s2i/bin/run#L18-L27). This is a good idea since it's common practice and enables a developer to set flags...

Using pretty basic Dockerfile ``` FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/nodejs-14:latest USER root RUN yum update -y nodejs-nodemon-2.0.3 ``` However, Clair scan always report following error. Tried updating `nodejs-nodemon` package using various ways, however...

Many Node.js applications use a different port (e.g., React.js assumes 3000), or even avoid using networking altogether (e.g., Node.js CLI tools). I think the benefits of assigning a default port...

The new file will never conflict with anything. It only serves for keeping the PR on github.com opened for longer time without need to rebase. The PR is supposed to...

Hello! I used the s2i-nodejs task from the [OpenShift tekton catalog](https://github.com/openshift/pipelines-catalog/blob/master/task/s2i-nodejs/0.1/s2i-nodejs.yaml)), with the same parameters and settings. My package.json contains private git (bitbucket) repository, so when the container trying to...

Just wondering, the GID here is '0' (the root group) . https://github.com/sclorg/s2i-nodejs-container/blob/master/8/Dockerfile#L66 Why is this? Shouldn't it be 1001 as well ?

It would be awesome if this image had the ability to execute `npm ci` instead of `npm install` on the node 10+ images.