pyhf
pyhf copied to clipboard
Warnings with pytorch backend and simplemodels
Summary
I ran into two warnings with the pytorch
backend, see below. I have not tried to look at where exactly they come from so far.
OS / Environment
n/a
Steps to Reproduce
Run the following with python -Wd
:
import pyhf
pyhf.set_backend("pytorch")
model = pyhf.simplemodels.uncorrelated_background(
signal=[24.0, 22.0], bkg=[50.0, 52.0], bkg_uncertainty=[3.0, 7.0]
)
File Upload (optional)
No response
Expected Results
no warnings
Actual Results
[...]/pyhf/src/pyhf/tensor/pytorch_backend.py:201: DeprecationWarning: In future, it will be an error for 'np.bool_' scalars to be interpreted as an index
return torch.as_tensor(tensor_in, dtype=dtype)
[...]/pyhf/src/pyhf/tensor/pytorch_backend.py:201: UserWarning: Creating a tensor from a list of numpy.ndarrays is extremely slow. Please consider converting the list to a single numpy.ndarray with numpy.array() before converting to a tensor. (Triggered internally at /Users/runner/work/pytorch/pytorch/pytorch/torch/csrc/utils/tensor_new.cpp:204.)
return torch.as_tensor(tensor_in, dtype=dtype)
pyhf Version
pyhf, version 0.7.0rc2.dev18
Code of Conduct
- [X] I agree to follow the Code of Conduct
[...]/pyhf/src/pyhf/tensor/pytorch_backend.py:201: DeprecationWarning: In future, it will be an error for 'np.bool_' scalars to be interpreted as an index return torch.as_tensor(tensor_in, dtype=dtype)
I need to look if we have an Issue for this. If not, then I should probably make one and update the PyTorch API and also figure out what a new lower bound on torch
should be.
[...]/pyhf/src/pyhf/tensor/pytorch_backend.py:201: UserWarning: Creating a tensor from a list of numpy.ndarrays is extremely slow. Please consider converting the list to a single numpy.ndarray with numpy.array() before converting to a tensor. (Triggered internally at /Users/runner/work/pytorch/pytorch/pytorch/torch/csrc/utils/tensor_new.cpp:204.) return torch.as_tensor(tensor_in, dtype=dtype)
This is known as it was added to
https://github.com/scikit-hep/pyhf/blob/a6186405ae5acee472133874e9a477dc41def7df/pyproject.toml#L89
in PR #1773. This should get fixed at some point if possible, but isn't a huge pain point.