Trolli Schmittlauch

Another example for that, in which a multi-line code block is marked with \`\`\`: - before - ```python print("multiline code sample") ``` - after

> because they would involve the IO manager. Can you elaborate on this? AFAIK the GHC IO manager is built around `epoll`, notifying the runtime once new data is available...

@kazu-yamamoto I found a [discussion on that topic](https://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/180481/discussion-between-k-a-buhr-and-dfeuer) that suspects the reason behind the non-thread-safety remark in the documentation to be the `close` behaviour of `fdSocket`s, introduced in 30b7d7971b5e60da13dcb3c58244c66f8a308380. So...

While digging through some Haskell project code dealing with UDP I've found several code bases where multiple threads use the same Datagram socket concurrently. All of them are from earlier...

Thanks to both of you for your helpful comments. > Perhaps the documentation could be changed to discuss performance, rather than safety, maybe that'd be less confusing? Yes, that'd be...

@kazu-yamamoto I am still tinkering with sockets and networking, so I still need some time to gather experience. After that, I am willing to improve the docs.

@vdukhovni One more question: Is there any reason against sending and receiving in parallel on the same socket in 2 different threads, like receiving (and blocking) in one thread while...

just to give an estimate for when I'm going to do this: I hope to find time in October

I didn't set a `WEB_DOMAIN`, this configuration is commented out in my .env.production Nevertheless I get exactly this issue.

Looks like this feature will be included in Mastodon 4.0: #17977