Alain Schlesser

Sounds like a reasonable use case.

My best guess is that some occurrences of the pattern to search might be hidden by escaping or serialization, and you'd need to iterate over the dataset with PHP and...

@paulschreiber The default behavior of `search-replace` is to act on a single site only, namely the site you've provided via the `--url` flag (or whatever WP-CLI defaults to when the...

I think it makes sense to be able to skip views for certain commands. However, the default behavior for `wp_get_table_names()` should be to include them, as they are meant to...

Maybe this is a good first use case for the error message redirection discussed in https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/issues/4158 ?

I don't think the current behavior is wrong. It is not that `--url` is being ignored. It is still being used to run a specific URL through WP's "router" to...

Thanks for the report, @Benunc! I think it might make even more sense to actually forward errors or warnings, and in this case show an error that a read-only db/table...

I think the idea has merit, but I'm not too sure about the naming. We can already limit the search&replace operation to a single (or a set of) table(s) by...

Thanks for introducing this feature request. I don't think it is a good idea to move into that direction, though. `wp search-replace` is a DB-level command, not an entity-level command....

@dasbuilder Would you mind opening a separate issue for the above? This looks like a bug we should investigate.