Jens Schauder

I think we agree on the pro and cons of Graphml. Back then it was (and probably still is) the easiest way to get nice visuals with a flexible layout....

It's still a valid issue though.

This would certainly be possible and AFAIK all one needs for this is a maven plugin for Degraph. Although I never wrote a Maven plugin, it's supposedly rather easy. Unfortunately...

If you want to do it you have two options: - create your own project depending on degraph core - or create a new module in this project and make...

The plugin would have a dependency on [degraph-core](http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/de.schauderhaft.degraph/degraph-core) so it can use the Degraph functionality. For how to use it, probably the best is to look at the Degraph main...

You can't do this in the general form, but what you can do is define the following slicing: ``` classpath().withSlicing( "hex-architecture", "com.enterprise.business.(domain)", "com.enterprise.business.domain.(repo)", new NamedPattern("implementation", "com.enterprise.business.domain.repo.**")) ``` This will prevent...

Sorry there is currently no sane way to do that. I'm aware of that limitation and are planning to make major changes to this area to enable this. But I...

> then consider this as a feature request for programmable custom constraints. Already did that. The rough plan for implementation involves removing the constraints from the configuration and creating Matchers...

There are very reasonable use cases to not use Degraph on tests or with a different rule set. Degraph basically forces you to pull all integration tests way up in...

Thanks for the input,