Juan M. Cruz-Martinez
Juan M. Cruz-Martinez
1. Mmm, that one is painless and autogenerated, I think it is fine. 2. It does work, not sure how many people use `vp-list` in general, but it does work....
This is actually something I was wondering also yesterday when we discused about 41_001_000, maybe we should only printout the `_000` theories, for which the comment should explain to what...
Can we review plus merge this now @Radonirinaunimi or do we want to wait for ref. replies?
Now that the paper is accepted, should we merge this as is?
@Radonirinaunimi what do we do with this PR?
Some results from today's code meeting, using directly the NNLO grids (which are slightly different) to compute the chi2 and `NNPDF40_nnlo_as_01180` as PDF. legacy: 0.6911 default: 8.743 default with `CT18Z`:...
Thank you very much for this @achiefa Is this the same dataset that was problematic in the pheno paper? I thought we had checked that the old version was ok...
The new one is incompatible also with other datasets though, since we were not able to fit it by itself without mhou...
I've been talking a bit with Tom about this problem and trying to compare our data to theirs... statistical uncertainties and data seem to be the same, and the 200+...
No, it doesn't. It's too small of a change, but this was a difference between the two (and different from the paper we reference in the code to say 1.8,...